This window
By the Transfer Tracker Data Desk · Updated 1 September 2026
Biggest spender: Chelsea · Total outlay: €5.78bn · Clubs spending: 40
Who is backing the manager in the 2026 window. Clubs ranked by gross spend, with what they have recouped in sales and their net outlay alongside, led by Chelsea on €407m. Figures are confirmed permanent-deal fees. As of 1 September 2026.
| # | Club | Spent | Recouped | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chelsea | €407m | €273m | €134m |
| 2 | Tottenham Hotspur | €355m | €164m | €191m |
| 3 | Manchester City | €310m | €342m | −€32m |
| 4 | Newcastle United | €250m | €276m | −€26m |
| 5 | Arsenal | €227m | €46m | €181m |
| 6 | Real Madrid | €225m | €59m | €167m |
| 7 | Aston Villa | €216m | €360m | −€145m |
| 8 | Liverpool | €209m | €30m | €179m |
| 9 | Ipswich Town | €200m | €18m | €181m |
| 10 | Manchester United | €173m | €52m | €121m |
| 11 | FC Barcelona | €173m | €87m | €86m |
| 12 | Juventus | €156m | €17m | €139m |
| 13 | AC Milan | €156m | €79m | €78m |
| 14 | Paris Saint Germain | €151m | €284m | −€134m |
| 15 | Brighton & Hove Albion | €143m | €189m | −€46m |
| 16 | Atlético de Madrid | €142m | €59m | €83m |
| 17 | Nottingham Forest | €138m | €157m | −€18m |
| 18 | Coventry City | €126m | — | €126m |
| 19 | Brentford | €124m | €13m | €111m |
| 20 | Sporting CP | €123m | €237m | −€113m |
| 21 | Roma | €123m | €11m | €112m |
| 22 | Fiorentina | €112m | €10m | €102m |
| 23 | Borussia Dortmund | €109m | €36m | €73m |
| 24 | Hull City | €104m | €15m | €89m |
| 25 | FC Bayern München | €103m | €48m | €55m |
| 26 | Bayer 04 Leverkusen | €103m | €122m | −€19m |
| 27 | Inter | €101m | €27m | €75m |
| 28 | Leeds United | €100m | €33m | €67m |
| 29 | Everton | €99m | €26m | €73m |
| 30 | Fulham | €86m | €21m | €66m |
| 31 | Benfica | €85m | €117m | −€32m |
| 32 | Fenerbahçe | €83m | €29m | €54m |
| 33 | Paris | €80m | €5m | €75m |
| 34 | AFC Bournemouth | €80m | €11m | €68m |
| 35 | Al Ahli | €79m | €4m | €75m |
| 36 | Strasbourg | €78m | €171m | −€93m |
| 37 | TSG Hoffenheim | €68m | €63m | €5m |
| 38 | Napoli | €67m | €49m | €18m |
| 39 | Crystal Palace | €63m | €112m | −€49m |
| 40 | Galatasaray | €63m | €5m | €58m |
Gross spend flatters the clubs simply buying; net spend is where the smart operators show. 3 of the top ten have run a negative net spend, funding incomings largely through sales rather than pure outlay.
Gross spend is the sum of confirmed permanent fees a club has paid for incomings. Recouped is what it has banked in sales. Net is the difference. Loans are excluded. Rankings are by gross spend; the net column is the truer measure of outlay.
Chelsea has the highest gross spend in the 2026 window, at €407m.
Net spend is what a club has paid out in fees minus what it has recouped in sales. A low or negative net spend means a club has largely funded its incomings by selling, a sign of a self-sustaining model.
Gross spend answers the most-asked question — who is spending the most — directly. Net spend is shown alongside because it is the better guide to a club’s actual financial outlay once sales are counted.
See the full ranking, updated live. Open on transfertracker.ai
Data as of 1 Sept 2026, 05:36 UTC · pages refresh several times daily · live numbers load in a moment.